T-SQL Tuesday #35 – Soylent Green

T-SQL Tuesday is a recurring blog party, that is started by Adam Machanic (Blog | @AdamMachanic). Each month a blog will host the party, and everyone that want’s to can write a blog about a specific subject.

This month the subject is “Soylent Green”. If you want to read the opening post, please click the image below to go to the party-starter: Nick Haslam (Blog | @nhaslam).



The question of this month was to write down our most horrifying discovery from our work with SQL Server. If you work with SQL long enough, you will encounter some strange situations. One way or the other…

My first experience with SQL Server was at my first official IT job. Back then I worked for an insurance company, and there I was offered the opportunity to become a “Conversion Specialist”. This meant that I visited customers, advised them about their data and our software, and converted and import their data into our main system. When I started the job, I’d never wrote a single T-SQL statement. So the learning curve was pretty steep, but after some sleepless nights of studying, I got the hang of it. And during this job, I encountered my first (of many) horrifying experiences…

In this company, the main application took it’s data from one (!!!) SQL 2000 database. The system contained all the data the company had, and it was a “rebuild” DOS application in Delphi (at that time the company worked with Delphi and .NET). In order to store all of their data into one data model (yeah, I know!), they created a “flexible and dynamic” model… In one table…

The data was stored in one table (it wants to remain anonymous, so from now on we’ll call him “Foo”), and Foo contained more then 200 columns (as I recall correctly). Every time we inserted a record into Foo, SQL Server calmly mentioned that the limit of 8000 bytes (max. per record) was exceeded. How they fixed that? I still haven’t got a clue…

Every “object” stored in Foo contained properties, or a collection of properties (which obviously ended up in 1 record for each item in the collection). But as I mentioned, they were stored “dynamically”. So if you wanted to retrieve an object “Tree”, then you needed columns 15, 18, 20 and 52. When retrieving an object “Bird”, you needed columns 15, 18, 25 and 2550 for the same properties.

But I must honestly admit: I left the company after six years with tears in my eyes. They offered me a lot of opportunities, and the colleagues were awesome!

Another example I encountered on a production environment (at a different company), was an issue with currency calculations. The product data and the currency rates were loaded from 2 different data sources. To combine these in one record (and calculate the turnover), they used a CASE statement in the script, that ran in the Data Warehouse. But when I took over the Data Warehouse, they forgot to mention one thing…

If a product was sold for 100 Mexican pesos (with current exchange rates this is about € 6.00 or $ 7.80), and no exchange rate from pesos to dollar was present, the script ended up in the ELSE clause. This clause multiplied the amount with 1, “not to mess up the data”. And without anyone noticing, 100 Mexican pesos turned into $ 100! It actually took a while for people to notice this (including me!).

And I’m probably not the only one with these experiences, so I’m glad Nick asked us to share them with the rest of the #SQLFamily! And if you want to read more of the horrifying experiences, let me know. I might write another blog post about this, because this feels like therapy! And it’s another change for me to make Rob Volk (a great guy, and great example to me!) proud, by using the “Evil” tag again!😉

One Response to T-SQL Tuesday #35 – Soylent Green

  1. Pingback: Soylent Green – The Aftermath – #TSQL2sday « Dev Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: